Swing Voter Sentiment - Trump

Swing Voters Grow Increasingly Indifferent to Trump

July 15, 2026

The latest reading records net sentiment at –22, almost unchanged from –21 in the previous wave. Since the beginning of March, the tracker has moved between –20 and –28 despite an extraordinary series of events involving war, corruption allegations, the Epstein files, immigration, the economy and repeated clashes over presidential power. The consistency is remarkable. It increasingly suggests that swing voters are no longer reassessing Trump in response to each new development. They have largely formed their view of him, and the news now provides different reasons for reinforcing the same conclusion.

This is reflected in the unusual spread of negative conversation. There is no single overwhelming issue. General anti-Trump sentiment leads at 20 percent, followed by corruption and Iran at 14 percent each. FIFA and Trump’s record in office account for eight percent apiece, as does criticism of Republicans and MAGA supporters. Epstein, birthright citizenship, the economy and allegations of electoral interference all remain present, but none dominates.

That does not mean the news agenda has become less serious. Rather, negativity towards Trump has become more structural. Earlier waves were shaped by distinct flashpoints. Epstein drove sentiment to –47 in January. The initial attack on Iran gave right-leaning swing voters something to rally around and helped lift Trump to –20 in March. This wave is different. No one event is determining the verdict because voters already carry a broad and established impression of the presidency.

Iran nevertheless requires particular attention. Its continued prominence does not reflect voters relitigating the original decision to attack. The conflict has resumed in all but name, with the ceasefire collapsing, strikes restarting and the Strait of Hormuz becoming the centre of a wider military and economic confrontation. Iran is therefore not an old controversy refusing to disappear. It is an active crisis generating new reasons for voters to question Trump’s leadership.

What was initially presented as a decisive intervention has become an ongoing test of strategy and competence. Swing voters are now judging Trump on the continuing consequences: renewed hostilities, uncertainty over the endgame, threats to shipping, the risk of higher energy prices and the possibility of a wider regional conflict. Iran has moved from being an event to being a condition — a permanent backdrop against which the administration’s judgement is assessed.

Corruption is following a similar path. Although it has fallen from the extraordinary 33 percent recorded in the previous wave, it remains a prominent negative topic. It is no longer dependent on a single allegation or policy proposal. Instead, perceptions of self-enrichment, favoritism and abuse of power are becoming embedded within the wider Trump brand. Individual stories may come and go, but they increasingly fit an established narrative that the presidency is being used for personal and political advantage.

The same is true of the smaller issues. Epstein has risen slightly to six percent but remains far below the levels seen earlier in the year. Birthright citizenship, voter fraud and authoritarianism each provide fresh expressions of familiar concerns about law, power and democratic restraint. Even stories involving FIFA and national celebrations are interpreted through pre-existing views of Trump’s ego, self-promotion and desire to place himself at the center of public life.

The positive conversation appears healthier for Trump than in the previous wave. Direct pro-Trump discussion now matches anti-Democratic conversation at 25 percent. This is a notable improvement from the last period, when supportive discussion was overwhelmingly defined by attacks on Democrats rather than enthusiasm for Trump himself. His supporters are again more willing to advocate for him directly, while defensive posts and criticism of the mainstream media add further reinforcement.

Yet this renewed enthusiasm has produced almost no movement in the overall score. That is the central contradiction. Trump’s supporters may be speaking more positively, but they are not broadening his appeal among the wider swing-voter group.

Electorally, this matters because the data increasingly suggests Trump is operating within a narrow and deeply negative range. The issues change, the balance within the conversation shifts and different groups become louder or quieter. But the overall judgement barely moves.

The administration may take some comfort from the absence of another collapse. However, stability at –22 is not political strength. It reflects an electorate that remains substantially more negative than positive and increasingly resistant to persuasion. Trump can still dominate the headlines and mobilize his supporters. What he appears less able to do is change the minds of swing voters who have already settled on a verdict.

For the full report visit our Substack here