The US Cost of Living Index
Iran Deepens Consumer Anxiety — Raising Midterm Risk
March 04- 17 2026
The most important development in cost-of-living sentiment is not just that it remains negative, but that it is now drifting lower again. The latest reading (Mar 3–17) falls to –13, continuing a steady slide from –7 at the start of the year. This is not a sudden collapse, but a clear trend. What had begun to stabilize is now weakening.
For voters, this matters. It does not necessarily reflect a sharp deterioration in conditions, but a growing frustration that things are not meaningfully improving. The sense of pressure that defined much of 2025 remains firmly in place. Everyday life still feels expensive, wages still feel insufficient, and financial security remains uncertain.
At the same time, a new factor is beginning to shape how people think about their situation: Iran. While still a relatively small part of the overall conversation, it is already having a noticeable impact — particularly through gas prices, where any increase is highly visible to cash strapped voters.
But the political significance goes beyond the immediate increase in fuel costs. Voters have recent memory of how global events — from COVID to the war in Ukraine — fed directly into higher prices at home. As a result, Iran is not being viewed in isolation. It is being interpreted as the start of something that could make an already difficult situation worse.
That expectation matters. Even before broader price increases materialize, the perception that costs could rise again is enough to shift sentiment. Voters begin to brace for impact — pulling back spending, expressing frustration and questioning whether those in power are able to shield them from further economic pressure.
This comes on top of already low confidence. While the pace of price increases may have slowed, there is little belief that the administration can materially improve household finances. The disruption and volatility of the past year have left a residue of skepticism. Stabilization has reduced anxiety, but it has not restored trust.
The result is a more fragile political environment. When confidence is low, even relatively small changes — like a rise in gas prices — can have an outsized effect on how voters feel about the economy and those in charge of it. Economic perceptions become more reactive, more emotional, and more easily shaped by events.
Looking ahead to the 2026 midterms, this dynamic is important. Elections are not fought on economic data alone, but on how voters feel about their own financial situation. Right now, that feeling remains negative — and increasingly sensitive to new shocks.
The key takeaway is that the cost of living is not just a persistent problem — it is a politically active one. With sentiment drifting lower and anxiety rising, particularly in response to events like Iran, the economy remains a central vulnerability. Unless voters begin to feel genuine improvement in their day-to-day finances, the risk for those in power is that even limited disruptions translate into broader political consequences.
Visit our Substack for the full archive
About The Cost of Living Index
Most economic data captures outcomes after the fact and often fails to reflect how conditions are actually experienced. Our work instead tracks how Americans talk about the cost of living, job security and financial pressure in real time. This human-read data trains a proprietary language model that highlights early shifts in confidence and behavior at scale, before they appear in polling or government data — if at all — with clear implications for voting preferences and turnout in the 2026 midterms.